Friday, August 11, 2017

Statement Analysis: Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber


This statement has 247 words, 18 lines, 1385 spaced characters, and 1631 non-spaced characters. Approximately 20% of the paragraph are adjectives, 25% verbs, 46% nouns, 7% adverbs, and 49% functions words, which according to research, functions words are words that provide little lexical significance or have little ambiguity to the meaning its meaning or the sentence.

The word count showed that James’s most used word was women, writing it 12 times in one paragraph. “Women” count for a 7.59 % of the paragraph structure. This, according to research on language and words usage indicates that James might have additional personal issues with the opposite gender than those expressed in this paragraph. Additional studies are required to determine the nature and extent of those issues. See Figure 1 Word Cloud, and Table 1 Word Weight Percentage for a broader idea of the structure and word use in this paragraph. 

Additional analysis indicates that only a 15.81% of the words imply to the content of the paragraph. James used too many ‘big words’ which research shows it is a self-conscious way of expression and in many situations, it indicates that the person has social/workplace issues due to the nature of his/her behavior.

James used 53 words to explain why he perceived that women prefer their professional development in social and artistic areas, which according to the Department of Labor (2017) it is not true. His argument is debatable. See the table below. In fact, statistics show that men also favor arts as their professional fields, as much or maybe more than women. Also, line and six of the statement, the ones highlighted in pink, those are two standalone sentences. Line eight explains James’s perceived assumption and judgment. Lines nine and ten contradict themselves: “Note that these are just average differences (on what is he basing this average?), and there’s overlap between men and women (I would like more information on where what, or how men and women overlap before making an assessment) but this seen “solely as a women’s issue” (By the end of the sentence it is not an overlap anymore. Now is just a women’s issue?)

For lines 13, 14, and 15, highlighted in pink, I would suggest requesting more information to determine its validity. Lines 17 and 18, also highlighted in pink are also debatable. Academic research showed that there are no significant gender-specific differences associated with personality or emotions between men and women.

Further, emotional intelligence research also showed that there is not gender-specific difference defining the individuals’ emotional intelligence competencies, or the way that individuals manage their emotions.

According to the evaluation of this statement, James “needs to stop assuming that gender gap implies sexism” and evaluate his own perception of the overall situation. How is it affecting him? How responsible is James of his own situation? What is bothering the most? How emotionally aware is James? How satisfy is James with his choices? Is James suffering from some form of depression? Does James feel that he is not advancing enough in his professional environment? Those are questions that will help us to explore the motivations behind James’s manifesto.

Moreover, according to research, the gender gap is an existing cultural problem. However, it is less likely that the gender gap is directly associated with racism against sex or sexism which is an entirely different topic. See Figure 3 Pew Research Center for additional information on the gender gap.

Word Cloud 
Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber
 




 Data by Area and Occupation

Monday, August 7, 2017

DHS S&T Awards $645K to Northeastern University to Develop Systems for Auditing and Controlling Personal Information Leaks

WASHINGTON—The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) has awarded Northeastern University (NEU) $645,229 to develop a system that organizations and individuals can use to audit and control personally identifiable information (PII) leaks from connected devices. The award was made through the S&T Cyber Security Division’s (CSD) Data Privacy project. CSD is part of the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency. CSD’s Data Privacy project seeks architectures, tools, applied models and other solutions across the research-and-development (R&D) lifecycle along three primary contexts: connected devices, mobile computing and sensor platforms; large-scale and heterogeneous data and algorithms; and the delivery of digital services.


Read More: https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/news/2017/08/07/news-release-dhs-st-awards-645k-northeastern-university

Friday, August 4, 2017

Statement Analysis

We can apply statement analysis to any documents. A VP of a magazine wrote the below statement. I couldn’t resist to review the statement and provide my recommendations on what should not be done in a statement letter when it will target millions of people. My suggestions are not perfect, but it is a start.

Monday, July 31, 2017

Le gustaria participar en un estudio para el cresimiento professional de la mujer?

Estoy conduciendo un estrudio academico de los factores cognitivos y no cognitivos que podrían influir en que las mujeres se sientan crónicamente menos poderosas que los hombres. Este problema es una cuestión socioeconómica relevante que afecta al desarrollo de las mujeres en las sociedades actuales. Para explorar este tema, necesito entrevistar a varias personas. La entrevista es diez minutos y se puede conducir por teléfono, correo electrónico, o cara a cara si se encuentra en un estado cercano a NJ. Por favor envíeme un mensaje si le gustaria participar en este projecto: iberkisfaltas@gmail.com

Call for participation in research study


Hello everyone,
I am conducting a research study on the cognitive and non-cognitive factors that could influence women to feel chronically less powerful than men. It is a relevant socioeconomic issue affecting women’s development in current societies. To explore this issue, I need to interview multiple people. The interview is a ten-minute interview that can be conducted via phone, email, or face-to-face if located in a state close to NJ. Please send me a message if you would like to participate: iberkisfaltas@gmail.com
Thank you

Friday, July 21, 2017

When Are Medical Doctors Dehumanized Becoming Automated Machines?

Medical doctors, psychologist, attorney of law, social workers, counselors, police officers, education, nurse, public and customer service, management, and leadership are some of the professional fields that need the most emotionally intelligent individuals. Each has a very challenging road that comes with each territory. Those fields deal with perceived critical issues, relevant to each particular individual. Those issues might not be important for the rest of the word, but those issues are important for them. 

Some of the most important emotional intelligence skills that must be mastered by the individuals working in the fields mentioned above are self-awareness, self-management, empathy, social responsibility, impulse control, flexibility, stress tolerance, optimism, perceiving emotions, understanding emotions, and using emotions—theirs or other’s—either to facilitate thoughts, judgements, and actions, or just to understand the needs of others. Note that one of the fields that I mentioned was the medical doctor. This particular field is one where individuals should never—ever—lose their emotional intelligence skills and abilities.

So, when doctors become dehumanized and transform into automated machines?

I accompanied my son to the doctor office, and the interaction with the doctor on duty put me on the verge of a madness-schizophrenic attack. I was so aggravated that I felt the blood rushing to my face, a mental block, and my heart pumping blood faster, and faster. A good thing that I am self-aware of my emotions because when I realized that I was about to lose my composure, I decided to walk away for couple seconds, breath, and recharge on self-control.

At this point, I am just thankful that I made it out of the doctor's office without a straightjacket or worse, on handcuffs. It was one of those doctor's office visit that instead of making everything better, it seems that they are on a witch-hunt to test your patient and sanity.

It started when my son called me and told me he was having chest pain. That information, coming from one of my three boys means a real emergency. My kids don’t complain about anything and have the habit of minimizing everything. So, when my child told me that he wanted to go to the doctor because he was having chest pain, I imagined the worst.

I left work immediately. I was also texting him every minute or two while on the train. The fact that he was texting me back told me that things weren’t as bad as I thought. Also, he walked himself to the doctor, which was also an indicator that things weren’t a real emergency. Still, he had chest pain, and that was the information hijacking the amygdala in the temporal lobes of my brain. My 24-year-old child had chest pain, and I needed to know why. 

Well, the doctor found a mass inside his chest. Now, imagine how an overly overprotected mother, attached to her kids like the vines to the wall felt about this “mass” in her child’s chest. I was petrified, scare, and thinking the worse. By the time I made it home, his girlfriend had taken him to get an ultrasound. Because my brain was focusing on the worst, I missed my train stop. By the time I made it home, they were done with the ultrasound, and a half-hour later, they were home. Now, it was a waiting game.

On Monday morning, I called the doctor’s office to make an appointment so we can find out about the results. The lovely lady on the phone told me that yes, the results were in but there was no appointment available until Friday. So, we had to wait until Friday—eight days later—to find out what was this “mass” on my son’s chest.

Friday, we get there early, my son, his girlfriend, and I. The doctor was not in the office, which is perfectly acceptable. A half hour later, the doctor still not in the office. One of the Medical's assistant told me that the doctor was running late—which was also fine. The most important were that the doctor was on the way.

Fifty-five minutes later, I asked if there was another doctor that could look at the results and tell me what was going on with my son. The Medical's assistant said yes, there was another doctor in the office, but she already had a patient. The medical assistant did me the favor of speaking with the other doctor, and she agreed to see my son when she finished with her current patient. Well, one hour and twenty minutes later, after she finished with her patient, she also took a well-deserved extra amount of time to talk, joke, and laugh out loud with others in the office while I waited inside one of the waiting rooms for her.

One hour forty-five minutes later, the Medical's assistant came in, asking my son where was the pain, if he still had the pain, if the pain was the same as it was last Friday, or if the pain got any better, and so on. The medical assistant seemed to be doing what I assumed was a “pre-consulting.” Mind, that was about one-hour and forty minutes after the routine blood-pressure measurement, weight, temperature, and the routine welcoming was completed.  I looked at her puzzled and a little confused. I did not want to think that it was the doctor who sent her to ask all those questions. I really did not want to think about it.

Unfortunately, I was right.

Almost two hours later, after I went off on the arrogance of the doctor, their careless attitude, their insensitiveness, their mighty arrogance, and so on, the one doctor on duty finally walked in the room. Mind that I was waiting for two hours. So, the doctor walked in with computer in hands, head in the computer, no eye contact, no hello, asking the mechanicalized “how are you?” to the walls of the rooms, not waiting for an answer, and without looking at him, or me, or anyone else in the room.
She just looked at her computer. The "how are you?" might as well had been directed to the computer. Silly me thinking it meant to one of us.

After two hours of aggravating wait. After a lovely $$$$ insurance co-pay, a careless doctor, a mechanicalized automated doctor, who would not look patients in the eye, the doctor told me that my son’s ultrasound needed to be redone because he moved.

Of course, he moved!! Getting an ultrasound means to put pressure on a “mass” inside your chest. Of course, it will very likely hurt. So, moving should have been expected. I do not need a medical degree to figurate that one out. So, the whole process had to start from 0-point.

This visit was my second encounter with this medical practitioner. Any of it by choice. The first time, I had an appointment at the same private practice, my regular doctor was sick. The office staff did not tell me until I was there. Since I was already there and I was scheduled to travel out of the country the next day, and this doctor was the only one available, I took it. During this visit, the doctor did the same as with my soon. The doctor walked into the room, for the first time, with a computer in hands and the head in the computer, not looking at me.

For the whole six minutes that the consult when on, the doctor did not make eye contact once. The doctor just asked, asked, and asked routine questions, and gave me a prescription for medication. At this point, I did not trust to take the medication because I wasn't sure the doctor listened to a word I said. The doctor did not ask my name to confirm if I was the same individual in from her computer or showed any empathy about anything. It was kind of aggravating.

So, this time, my son made the appointment with this doctor because it was the only one available. I know my son is a grown man. I know I should not be involved in his doctors' appointments. I also know he can handle this situation on its own. I also know that most twenty-four years old adults are too busy with their lives, and most of the times, their priority do not include their health. I was just glad I was there to realized that some doctors do get dehumanized and become automatized machines.

At what point doctors--or any professional--become dehumanized, automatizing their behavior and responses to others?

We all go to the doctor mostly because something with our health is not functioning properly.  Our health, the health of our children, and the health of our family are probably few of the most important, sensitive, and meaningful topics for many of us. We also go to the doctor for hope, assurance, and comfort that things are going to be okay.

Getting sick scare the hell out of me. When I am sick—which most of the time comes along some sentimentalism, feeling of loneliness, need for empathy, and the need of someone who understands what I am feeling, and what I am going through—what I need is someone to listen and understand what I am feeling. Of course, I also need someone to tell me what is wrong with my health and how we can make it better.

Having a professional who understands how I am feeling, someone that will look straight in the eyes, and ask me a meaningful “how are you? What’s going on?” maybe with a smile—which is not required but it means a whole world of difference, give me a great deal of comfort.

What happened with those doctors that were part of our life, a member of our family? Those doctors that took care of the whole family and us? The doctor that knew everyone by the first name and showed that we actually meant something to them? Those doctors that gave us support felt empathy and gave us a pat on the back as a gesture of praise, approval, and moral support when we needed it the most. What happened to human doctors?

Unfortunately, time is not to blame. Research showed that long before now, doctors were required to spend a specific amount of time with their patients. Just to give you an idea, in the U.S. National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health, there was an article written by Doctors Dugdale, Epstein, and Pantilat (1999) that showed that long before the 80s, the median time for a doctor’s visit was between 5 to 8 minutes in Great Britain, and 10 to 18 minutes in the United States. While relatively, the doctor to patient time has not changed much, research also showed that patient to doctor satisfaction has.

Most doctors seem to be automatized machines. They walk into a waiting room with a computer in their hands and their heads inside the computers, caring more for the time and bills, payments than the patients who are supporting their bills. Some doctors don’t care about building a relationship with their patients. Others doctors do not have time to build rapport. These days, doctors do not get pay for these types of banalities. While many doctors seem to be worshiping the demands of their insurance companies, others can careless for what their patients are feeling. What everyone seems to be forgetting is that the doctor who does not build a stable clientele would almost certainly never have a stable practice. If doctor does not care for their patients, the patients will come and go, without providing them the stability, they need to build the foundation for a stable career.

Yes, insurance companies demand doctors to see their patients in a humiliating short amount of time. I understand it. It is up to the doctor to stand for what they believe and for what they are passionate about.

I am not a doctor in the medical field. But I always had the idea that doctors were doctors because they loved what they did. Doctor loved to make people feel better. They love to safe lives. Doctors love to make a difference.

When choosing a field of study, doctors knew the demands of the profession. Doctors knew the stress and pressure that comes with the glorification of being a doctor. Then, why not doing everything you can to stay human. Caring for others is a beautiful thing, and most likely, that is why you choose this field.

As an emotional intelligence professional these are my suggestions:
  • Learning self-awareness will help you to understand your strengths and weaknesses
  • Learning self-management will help you to control our moods, manage your emotions, focus on your achievements, and help you to have a positive outlook, even when you think things are in its worse
  • Learning empathy is a must. Learning empathy will also teach you to recognize, understand, and appreciate how you and other people are feeling while using those emotions to drive behavior
  • Learning social responsibilities will help you to re-emphasize your positive contributions to society
  • Learning impulse control will help you to stop the temptations of dehumanization, avoiding impulsive, thoughtless actions
  • Learning flexibility will help you to adapt to unfamiliar and unpredictable circumstances where neither you or your patient will be in full control
  • Learning stress tolerance will help you to cope with the challenges of the field, while also helping to take control of overpowering stressful situations
  • Learn optimism. Doctors must be optimistic. Seeking positive assurance is one of the reasons we go to you. We need optimism, positivism, and hope when we are sick. Being optimistic will help you and your patient to be hopeful and resilient, regardless of what the future is holding for your or your patients
  • Learn to be perceptive, but also learn how to see things from the perception of your patient.
  • Do not lose your EMPATHY. All doctors must recognize, understand, appreciate, and be able to communicate with others, regardless of the challenging circumstances. Show that you care for your patients. Show that you will do anything you can for your patient’s life and use all that emotional information around you to facilitate your thoughts, judgments, and actions. But the most important, everything you do, MEAN IT. Do not respond to your environment like you are a machine. Please do not forget why you became a wonderful doctor. Also, remember that we would be lost without you.
Iberkis Faltas, MS, PMP, PhD (ABD)
Public Policy & Administration
Management & Leadership | Law & Policy
Certified Emotional Intelligence Coach
Adjunct Faculty - Speaker 

Saturday, July 1, 2017

"Las mujeres se sienten cronicamente mas subestimadas que los hombres"? Completa esta encuesta con solo una pregunta y has tu contribución a los cambios sociales. "¡Sus comentarios son importantes! https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/LFT2M8Z

Friday, June 30, 2017

"Women feel chronically less powerful than men." Please take this one question survey. Your participation is confidential. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CTQHLSN

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Thursday, June 8, 2017

Snapshot: S

Snapshot: S




Snapshot: S&T Helps Explosive Detection Canine Teams get REDDI




Release Date: 
June 7, 2017
A police officer trains his K9 on detecting explosives.Dogs are uniquely suited to sniffing out explosives – their sense of smell is more than a million times stronger than a human’s.  Harnessing this natural ability to help law enforcement identify explosives requires specialized training and testing. Many detection canine teams, however, have limited access to critical training materials and limited time to establish rigorous training scenarios. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate’s (S&T) Detection Canine Program has developed an initiative to support these needs for the nation’s more than 4,000 explosives detection canine teams.

The DHS S&T Detection Canine Program, part of S&T’s Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Explosives Division, has created the Regional Explosives Detection Dog Initiative (REDDI), a series of events aimed at advancing the knowledge and capabilities of the nation’s detection canine teams.

“We are setting up real-world problems,” said Don Roberts, DHS S&T Detection Canine Program Manager. “REDDI seeks to improve the operational effectiveness of the law enforcement explosive detection canine teams while informing S&T on where our research investment needs to be focused going forward.“

In March 2017, the Detection Canine Program kicked off REDDI to share knowledge and provide exercises in basic odor recognition and realistic operational search scenarios. REDDI began with the first event in Fort Myers, Florida, and moved to Westport, Connecticut, in April.  Miami, Florida, is scheduled to host REDDI in late May, and plans are underway to continue REDDI through 2018.  Up to 20 explosives detection canine teams participate in each two-day program, which includes classroom presentations on current explosive threats and the chemistry of explosives, as well as odor recognition trials and operational searches.  The goal is to improve explosive detection canine team training effectiveness and efficiency in order to improve overall operational proficiency.

REDDI provides a realistic setting where law enforcement teams from several jurisdictions can evaluate their detection capabilities, understand their strengths, and identify additional training needs.  The DHS detection canine research program benefits from REDDI in that it validates current investments and informs the direction of future research.  Participation in a REDDI event is often the first opportunity a local law enforcement explosive detection canine team has to assess their capabilities in authentic, real world scenarios, with scientifically rigorous oversight by DHS S&T.

k9 officers learn REDDI techniques.S&T has funded two tools to strengthen the impact of REDDI – non-hazardous peroxide training aids and a custom-developed data collection tool.  S&T partnered with the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory to develop non-hazardous, non-detonable canine training aids made with actual peroxide-based explosives through a patented process. These training aids can be used anywhere, require no special handling or storage requirements, and provide explosives detection canine teams more opportunities to train with the peroxides in operational settings. 

“The problem is that these are sensitive explosives,” said Roberts. “They are difficult to train with, and the teams aren’t getting the frequency of training we feel might be necessary to stay proficient. Having non-hazardous training aids allows the teams to train with the peroxide material in the operational environment, like airports, stadiums or in mass transit.”

S&T is also using the Mobile Application for Canine Evaluation, or MACE, a tablet-based data collection tool developed by S&T partner Battelle Memorial Institute, to provide immediate feedback at REDDI events to canine teams and their trainers.  MACE compiles performance data in real time, which makes it possible for S&T to efficiently and effectively conduct REDDI as a two-day event.

“The explosives detection canine is the best, most versatile mobile explosive detection tool at our disposal for protecting the Homeland from the explosive threat,” said Roberts, “and DHS S&T’s mission is to provide tools, techniques and knowledge to better understand, train and utilize explosive detection canine teams in the operational environment.”

To learn more about REDDI, read the program factsheet or contact the team at SandT.explosives@hq.dhs.gov.

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

ICSR Insight: IS Attacks in Tehran - Scenarios and Implications
By Charlie Winter, Senior Research Fellow, ICSR
Earlier today, the Iranian Parliament building in central Tehran was stormed. Attackers, reportedly wearing women’s clothing, shot their way into the complex, and took an unknown number of hostages. Shortly afterwards, two suicide operations hit the shrine of Ayatollah Khomeini to the south of the city.

While the attack was still ongoing, the Islamic State released an official statement on Telegram, claiming that “fighters from the Islamic State are attacking the shrine of Khomeini and the Iranian Parliament building.”

Just under an hour later, the same official channel on Telegram published a short video filmed inside the Parliament building, seemingly shot using a headcam. In it, the attackers could be heard speaking in heavily accented Arabic, declaring that, “We [the Islamic State] will remain until the Final Hour, by the will of Allah.”

It is far too early to predict what will happen in the aftermath of this attack, but its implications could be dire. Here are four likely outcomes:
1.       While Iran’s counter-terrorism measures are already sophisticated, an attack like this could provoke a disproportionate response from the government, one that could manifest in increasingly draconian measures against politically active Sunni Muslims. Any disproportionality will reify the Islamic State's ideological appeal in Iran to no end, especially to those that are already on fence.
2.       Iranian officials will be called upon to step up the intervention in Iraq and Syria. Even if there is little more that they can actually do, these calls could result in an intensification in the “war” between Sunni and Shia Islam. This would have the effect of pouring petrol on the Islamic State's ideological fire. 
3.       Global Coalition dynamics are complicated enough as it is. Were Iran to intensify its intervention against the Islamic State, this would test it in the extreme, especially given Trump's new combative stance on Iran.
4.       And, perhaps most importantly, the attack will boost the Islamic State's flagging morale, especially at the footsoldier level. In months to come, it will be used by the group as a way to distract from territorial loss and, beyond that, it will be further weaponised as an ideological bludgeon against the Islamic State’s chief rival, al-Qaeda. Essentially, the group will say: "We, the Islamic State, promised to hit the Safavids. We, the Islamic State, have followed through. Al-Qaeda, on other hand, is friend of Iran, and it has done nothing." In the global jihadist war of ideas, this will be hugely important.
In sum, this attack against Iran makes strategic sense for the Islamic State in the same way that attacking the United States on 9/11 made strategic sense to Usama bin Ladin.

In the next few days, people will be wondering where this operation came from. Even if the attackers turn out to be foreign nationals, they will have required extensive support from a local network to execute something like this.

Iran is not known for its Islamic State supporters. However, in spite of the fact that it has rarely been spoken about in the media, the group has been agitating there for years now, and its supporters have been around for a long time, with dozens actually travelling to join the group. And, lest we forget, in 2016, the Islamic State eulogised seven Iranians that had died in suicide operations in Iraq and Syria.

Compared to many of its neighbours, Iran has a relatively strong and stable state, and its security services are notoriously effective. That is the principal reason why there has not been an attack there until now. The Islamic State has planned multiple operations in Iran in the past—this is just the first one to be a success.

Whatever happens, its implications could be enormous.
 
Charlie Winter is a Senior Research Fellow at ICSR. Follow him @charliewinter

Thursday, June 1, 2017

 Encuesta en la inestabilidad emocional de los ejecutivos y gerentes


1. ¿Cómo la inestabilidad emocional de los directivos empresariales influye el desempeño del empleado, incluyendo las relaciones interpersonales, la toma de decisiones, y el manejo del estrés su lugar de trabajo?

 

2. ¿Cómo la inestabilidad emocional de los directivos empresariales influye las políticas y regulaciones de la organización?


Envíeme su respuesta al correo electrónico ifaltas@ceipd.com. Su participación es confidencial .......

Managers emotional instability survey

 

1.  How do managers emotional instability influence the employee’s performance, interpersonal relationships, decision-making, and stress management in the workplace? 

 

2.  How do managers emotional instability influence organizational policies and regulations?


Email me your response at ifaltas@ceipd.com. Your participation is confidential.......

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Teleconference on H-2B nonimmigrant visa classification


U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) invites you to participate in a teleconference listening session on Thursday, May 25, from 2 to 3:30 p.m., to provide feedback on the H-2B nonimmigrant visa classification. We are interested in your feedback on the fiscal year 2017 omnibus appropriations legislation and, in particular, the impact that any potential increase in the number of H-2B workers may have on U.S. workers.
To join the teleconference:
Use the information below to join the session. We recommend calling in 10 to 15 minutes before the teleconference begins.
Note to Media: This engagement is not for press purposes. Please contact the USCIS Press Office at (202) 272-1200 for any media inquiries.

We look forward to engaging with you!

Recent Updated Immigration Forms

USCIS Forms Update Notice
USCIS recently updated the following USCIS forms:

I-829, Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status: New edition dated 04/21/17.  Starting 07/24/2017, we will only accept the 04/21/17 edition. Until then, you can use the 05/07/15 edition.
G-639, Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Request: New edition dated 04/17/17. Starting 07/24/2017, we will only accept the 04/17/17 edition. Until then, you can use the 03/31/15 edition. 

I-612, Application for Waiver of the Foreign Residence Requirement (under Section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended): New edition dated 04/24/17. Starting 07/24/2017, we will only accept the 04/24/17 edition. Until then, you can use the 12/23/16 edition.

Thursday, April 20, 2017

IMPORTANT: USCIS Reminds Beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status for Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone of May 21 Termination


USCIS Reminds Beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status for Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone of May 21 Termination
USCIS is reminding the public that the designations of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone terminate effective May 21, 2017.
To provide sufficient time for an orderly transition, the Department of Homeland Security gave beneficiaries under these three designations 8 months advance notice of the expiration by publishing 3 notices in the Federal Register on Sept. 22, 2016 (one for each country). These notices urged individuals who did not have another immigration status to use the time before the terminations became effective in May to prepare for and arrange their departure from the United States or to apply for other immigration benefits for which they may be eligible.
Although TPS benefits will no longer be in effect starting May 21, 2017, TPS beneficiaries will continue to hold any other immigration status that they have maintained or acquired while registered for TPS. Individuals with no other lawful immigration status on May 21, 2017, will no longer be protected from removal or eligible for employment authorization based on TPS.
TPS-related Employment Authorization Documents issued under the Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone designations are only valid through May 20, 2017, and will not be renewed or extended.
After reviewing country conditions and consulting with the appropriate U.S. government agencies, former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson determined that conditions in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone no longer support their designations for TPS. The widespread transmission of Ebola virus in the three countries that led to the designations has ended.
Additional information about TPS is available at uscis.gov/tps.

New US Citizenship and Immigration Service Policy Memo

New USCIS Policy Memo
The following immigration policy memorandum is now available on the Policy Memoranda section of the USCIS website:
Matter of O-A-, Inc. clarifies that USCIS must conduct a case-specific analysis to determine whether, at the time a provisional certificate is issued, a beneficiary has completed all substantive requirements to earn the degree and whether the university or college has approved the degree. If the provisional certificate does so demonstrate, USCIS will consider the date of the provisional certificate for purposes of calculating post-baccalaureate experience.

USCIS Will Issue Redesigned Green Cards and Employment Authorization Documents

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services today announced a redesign to the Permanent Resident Card (also known as a Green Card) and the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) as part of the Next Generation Secure Identification Document Project. USCIS will begin issuing the new cards on May 1, 2017.
These redesigns use enhanced graphics and fraud-resistant security features to create cards that are highly secure and more tamper-resistant than the ones currently in use.
The new card designs demonstrate USCIS’ commitment to continue taking a proactive approach against the threat of document tampering and fraud. They are also part of an ongoing effort between USCIS, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to enhance document security and deter counterfeiting and fraud.
The Redesigned Cards
The new Green Cards and EADs will:
  • Display the individual’s photos on both sides;
  • Show a unique graphic image and color palette:
    • Green Cards will have an image of the Statue of Liberty and a predominately green palette;
    • EAD cards will have an image of a bald eagle and a predominately red palette;
  • Have embedded holographic images; and
  • No longer display the individual’s signature.
Also, Green Cards will no longer have an optical stripe on the back.
How To Tell If Your Card Is Valid
Some Green Cards and EADs issued after May 1, 2017, may still display the existing design format as USCIS will continue using existing card stock until current supplies are depleted. Both the existing and the new Green Cards and EADs will remain valid until the expiration date shown on the card.
Certain EADs held by individuals with Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and other designated categories have been automatically extended beyond the validity date on the card. For additional information on which EADs are covered, please visit the Temporary Protected Status and American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act web pages on uscis.gov.
Both versions are acceptable for Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, E-Verify, and Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE). Some older Green Cards do not have an expiration date.  These older Green Cards without an expiration date remain valid. Individuals who have Green Cards without an expiration date may want to consider applying for a replacement card bearing an expiration date. Obtaining the replacement card will reduce the likelihood of fraud or tampering if the card is ever lost or stolen.
Eligibility for Green Cards and EADs
For more information about the Green Card application process, please visit USCIS.gov/greencard.
To request an EAD, you must file Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization. Visit uscis.gov for more information about EADs.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Why are women so under-represented in US politics?

In 2017, 104 (78D, 26R) women hold seats in the United States Congress, comprising 19.4% of the 535 members; 21 women (21%) serve in the United States Senate, and 83 women (19.1%) serve in the United States House of Representatives. Read more......http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/women-us-congress-2017

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Cyber Quiz

Test your cyber IQ with the quiz question below. You can find the correct answer at the bottom of the Newsletter.
Question: You receive an email from the IRS asking for you to respond with your full name, date of birth, and address in order to finish processing your tax refund. What should you do?
 A. Respond quickly with the information they asked for so you can receive your tax refund as soon as possible.
B. Do not respond and report the suspicious email to the IRS by email or phone.
C. Reply to the email asking them to confirm their legitimacy.
D. Other, none of the above.

Cyber Quiz Answer

The answer to this week’s Cyber Quiz above:
Answer: B. Do not respond and report the suspicious email to the IRS by email or phone. The IRS does not initiate contact with taxpayers by email to request personal or financial information. This includes any type of electronic communication, such as emails, text messages, and social media channels. Do not respond and report the suspicious email to the IRS by email at phishing@irs.gov or by calling at 1-800-366-4484. 

Sunday, March 5, 2017

Three Models of Emotional Intelligence



Too often, the notion of emotional intelligence in a professional environment makes many break out in sweat, palpitations, a pounding heart, start trembling, shaking really hard, with shortness of breath, a chocking sensation, and anxiety. 

The reality is not near as bad as we think. Emotional intelligence (EI) is a set of cognitive and non-cognitive competencies, skills, and abilities, directly and essentially connected to the behaviors and actions of everyone, in every field, including the actions of public administrators, policymakers, managers, and leader at any level of the organization bureaucracy.

The three major models of EI—Goleman’s EI performance model, Bar-On’s EI competencies model, and Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso’s EI ability model— resulted from decades of research, analysis, and scientific investigations. Those EI models focused on the individual’s cognitive and noncognitive competencies, skills, and abilities, with the purpose of understanding what emotions drive human behavior. 
According to Goleman, EI is an array of skills and competencies that contribute to the performance of managers and leaders in the workplace. Those skills and competencies focus on four capabilities: self-awareness, relationship management, self-management, and social awareness. These four EI competencies are the foundation of twelves EI subscales that include emotional self-awareness, emotional self-control, adaptability, achievement orientation, positive outlook, influence, coaching and mentoring, empathy, conflict management, teamwork, organizational awareness, and inspirational leadership.  
According to Bar-On, EI is an arrangement of interconnected behavior driven by emotional and social competencies that influence performance and behavior. Bar-On’s EI model focuses on five EI scales: self-perception, self-expression, interpersonal, decision-making, and stress management, and 15 subscales: self-regard, self-actualization, emotional self-awareness, emotional expression, assertiveness, independence, interpersonal relationship, empathy, social responsibility, problem-solving, reality testing, impulse control, flexibility, stress tolerance, and optimism, driving human behavior and relationships.
The last one, Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso, EI ability model focuses on perceiving understanding, and managing emotions, and using that information to facilitate thinking, and guide our decisions. Their EI framework emphases four branches of human abilities: perceiving emotions, facilitating thought, understanding emotions, and managing emotions strive to enhance the advancement of new intelligence and more intelligent method of building trusting relationships. 
A closed analysis showed that in fact, EI touches and influences every aspect of our lives, from driving our behavior, making decisions, solving conflicts, the way we feel about ourselves, how we communicate with others, and how we manage everyday stress, to the way we perform in the workplace, manage, and lead teams. EI influences every aspect of our personal and professional development, helping us to advance, mature, and reach our goals. 
In public administration, EI enhances and promote the type of human behavior that promotes fairness, social justice, social balance, leadership, trust, respect, motivation, growth, and excellence. EI improves and help us to build stronger relationships, influencing our senses, from the way we perceive, to the way we think about the world around us. 
It is extremely important to understand the distinctive characteristics between emotions and EI. Emotion is a natural instinctive state of mind that derives from our current and past experiences and situations. Emotions originate in our environment, circumstances, and knowledge, as well as our moods, and relationships. Our feelings and experiences influence our emotions.  Conversely, EI is the ability, skill, and awareness to know, recognize, and understand those feelings, moods, and emotions, and use them in a positive way. EI is learning how to manage feelings and emotions, and use that information to behave and act, including making decisions, solving problems, self-management, and leading others.
The Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations focuses on the advancement, research, and better practice of EI in organizational settings. Scholars in the organization believe that EI competencies, skills, and abilities are essential to a healthy and productive environment and behavior. Decades of academic research and scientific investigations allow the scholars to validate that EI enhances productivity, satisfaction, relationships, goals, and many other aspects of the individuals’ professional and personal life. Further, scholars validated and highlighted that EI enhances self-esteem, well-being, as well as professional and personal motivations. Academic research validated that EI competencies, skills, and abilities hold the key to greater career success, which in current modernism comprises the 80% of employee success, distinguishing the best from the average.
All public servants, managers, leaders, policymakers, and executive management, regardless of their professional fields and area of responsibility must learn EI capabilities. The knowledge and awareness linked to EI will help them to have a better understanding of their constituents, as well as a better control of their temper, frustrations, behavior, performance, and communication methods. 
Goleman said: “people do not leave the company, people leave bad bosses.” I concur with his statement. Keep it in mind when building your next team, writing your next policy, or communicating with the person next to you.
Iberkis Faltas, MS, PMP, PhD., (ABD)

Perception in Public Administration

    Emotional intelligence has been one of the faster-growing conceptualizations in social science since the 1990s. Research shows that the ...